Correctly Defining Modern Zionism. (Part One)
Not so long ago, prior to 1963 Zionism was war for territory only. Thereafter, the goals of Zionism became very different: To steal forever the proper conscience of man.
By: Brett Redmayne-Titley.
Not so long ago, prior to 1963 Zionism was war for territory only. Thereafter, the goals of Zionism became very different: To steal forever the proper conscience of man.
What is to be said of a religion that demands that normal human conscience accept bombing hospitals merely because that religion believes other humans to be “animals.” How can any religion excuse the barbarity of a nation as the “new normal” and legislate that we, the civilized must willingly accept their unconscionable new mind-set…or else!
The answer is found in a Jewish prayer of absolution. A prayer reviled for centuries and cast-out repeatedly by the theologians of Judaism. A prayer that has returned to prominence over the past two generations. It is now chanted every year so the Zionist mind can rest easy on one’s past sins and continue their violations renewed.
There is much that the civilized world does not understand about modern day Zionism. Today, the definition of being either Jewish, Israeli or Zionist are to most people analogous.
They are not.
We have been incrementally indoctrinated into submitting our minds to an incorrect, singular, and collective definition. Solely due to Zionism's false insistence of a direct religious link to Judaism, the objective and critical world that still maintains a proper conscience strangely cowers at the incorrect but inevitable charge of "anti-Semitism." This false association has too often caused the political and journalistic demise of many. Thus, the civilized world is scared away from exercising one's full mental faculties; such faculties of conscience that would normally rise in collective reaction and outrage. But not to the anti-social results of Zionism.
Yet.
It is high time, as Gaza and Gazan alike are exterminated again by Israel, for the outraged world to confidently respond against the erroneous broad brush of Anti-Semitism. This trick is used continually and routinely to mask any and all discussion of Israeli crimes.
As written previously, this “War for Your Mind’ continues unabated, it is essential to better understand "modern" Zionism as an affliction not peculiar at all to Judaism. Here, the fight begins. As revealed, Zionism is- when applying historical religious reality- a Jewish scourge, one deliberately ignored in factual discussions of Zionism and little understood by world Jewry as well.
This “War for Your Mind”, this mandated ignorance, is what can well be described as the root of the problem with understanding Zionist expansionism.
*
This Jewish prayer has been debated, reviled, and cast out by the most senior Jewish theologians repeatedly over the past two thousand years. It has been reborn in historic cycles. Many of the problems of our world- past and present- can be summed up and exemplified by the examination of this single prayer which is more exclusively Zionist in its modern worldwide usage. A prayer that, when considered correctly, is today a metaphor, the personification, the excuse, for all the moral decay that has led to so much suffering across the world today.
This metaphoric prayer transcends religion and Judaism, for it is the encouragement of a mental malignancy- now endemic- within humankind. Much worse, this prayer facilitates- nay, demands- the individual rotting of one's mind, one's conscience... and one's soul.
A purely unconscionable prayer. It's name?
The Kol Nidrei.
*
Of, Zionism Past: Saying a Prayer for Zionism.
Zionism and its demands for new Jewish territory is not a recent ideology.
The name is.
The term "Zionism" was coined by Theodore Herzl as the twentieth-century denotation of the two-millennium goal of a purely Jewish state of “Israel.” First cast-out from Judea by Roman emperor, Titus, in 70 AD due to their attempted dominance of that small piece of the Roman Empire the subsequent precursors of Zionism have met a similar fate on multiple occasions and by multiple other countries ever since. For centuries Judaism was repeatedly fallen afoul of its host nations for similar reasons, thus leaving Judaism repeatedly- until 1948- without a host country.
Unfortunately for the non-Zionist world Jewry, at many points throughout this sordid history the Jewish quest for a country was attempted via the ascension of powerful Jewish interests that progressively gained political and financial control- like Judea- over these nations by afflicting societal crimes that violated the conscience of the leaders of their host nations. As an example, in 1604 AD Catholic Pope Clement VIII proclaimed:
" All the world suffers from the user of the Jews, their monopoly and deceit. They have brought many unfortunate people into a state of poverty...especially working people and the very poor."
Here, Clement VIII- like many world leaders past and present- was inaccurate in his statement. He too did not correctly understand the Jewish subset of Zionism. Lacking a separate definition Clement VIII made the mistake of associating all Jews together, therefore collectively demonizing an entire religion and all its followers instead of the villains hiding behind their religion.
At that time, as is the case with modern Zionism today, the vast majority of world Jewry had committed no societal crime whatsoever and deserved no charge, yet due to the actions of the few Jews who willfully worked towards hegemonic sedition from within their host country of the time, Clement VIII cast-out all Jews in reaction. What Clement VIII failed to understand was that there was indeed a difference within this religion to be noted: a difference- a prayer- that was not necessarily inherent to Judaism but was embodied exclusively by Zionism and its advocacy of the societal hypocrisy espoused within the Kol Nidrei.
By extension, the unjustifiable horrors of the Holocaust were a reaction similar to Clement VIII: caused by collective but false demonization of all Jews as a reaction to the practices of the very few Zionists who had hypocritically violated the boundaries of the societal German conscience and the correct mandates of the Jewish Torah and Talmud.
Whether the decisions came from Rome, Berlin, or Tel Aviv today these leader’s used an unjustifiable rationale, one that excused their afflicted minds from turning Evil into Good, Devil into God, and Wrong into Right. This mental lapse of conscience is no longer, today, peculiar to any one religion. It is purely Zionist...the Kol Nidrei.
*
"All [personal] vows we are likely to make, all [personal] oaths and pledges we are likely to take between this Yom Kippur and the next Yom Kippur, we publicly renounce. Let them all be relinquished and abandoned, null and void, neither firm nor established. Let our [personal] vows, pledges and oaths be considered neither vows nor pledges nor oaths." -The Kol Nidrei.
The Kol Nidrei, often misspelt Kol Nidre, was not originally a prayer, but a declaration offered during Rosh Hashana, the start of the Jewish new year. Since 1963, in "modern" Judaism the Kol Nidrei is now delivered as a prayer now delivered yearly at the commencement of Judaism's holiest yearly event of Passover. Zionism has proportionately grown in prominence during its return.
For centuries there has been an internal philosophical Judaic controversy over whether the Kol Nidrei should be allowed to be included in Jewish services. It has been argued about, pro-or-con, by the most preeminent Judaic scholars, most of whom vehemently opposed its inclusion and banned it repeatedly outright. The concern of these fundamental Jewish leaders:
How can the Jewish religion flourish if it violates the most fundamental tenet of human conscience? Adherence to Right vs. legitimizing Wrong.
This question was succinctly answered over these centuries as the Kol Nidrei rightly fell from grace or was subsequently reinstated by new Zionist elements within society. Historical examination of the Kol Nidrei shows the polarity between the demand for the proper benevolence offered in the formal Judaism of the Torah and the post-Torah books of the Talmud. Over time, these books contained fewer moral rationales supported by this one single all-excusing prayer.
As noted by Benedict XIII in 1450 the deviance within Judaism was a result of the books of the Talmud. "The heresies, vanities and errors of the TALMUD prevent their [Jews] from knowing the truth." This was also firmly noted by Michael Rodkinson, in the preface of the Babylonian Talmud, page XI, who commented, "The modern Jew is the product of the Talmud."
The Kol Nidrei is as old as Judaism itself since its original text was in the ancient Aramaic language from before the time of Christ. Much of modern Jewry has falsely claimed that the prayer, used as an absolution, was created in modern times as a reaction to 20th-century Jewish persecution. This is not true since fervent discussions about the divisive use of the Kol Nidrei were in controversy for many centuries prior.
As long ago as the times of medieval Babylonian Jewry, five Geonim, the senior rabbinic leaders, were against its use while only one was in favor. Early Judaic scholar, Saadia Gaon, also wished to restrict the Kol Nidrei and declared that it gave no absolution from the oaths an individual took during the year. Continuing this argument against the Kol Nidrei, Rabbi Yehudai Gaon of Sura (760 AD), forbade the study of the Nedarim, the Talmudic treatise on oaths which includes the Kol Nidrei.
Of course, it was the most famous theologian of all time who first cast out the Kol Nidrei' and its demand for religious ignorance. He correctly identified the fundamental scourge of Zionism- known then as the Pharisees- and their justifications for crimes against society and religion. Long ago, said he…
"Ye [the Pharisees] are of your father the devil....and abode, not in the truth because there is not truth in him."
That man, in providing this historically accurate and prescient sage advice, he knew all too well of the societal evil to which he spoke (John VIII:44), for he too, was himself Jewish.
The man’s name?
Jesus Christ.
-END OF PART ONE-
(Important: Please SHARE this article. It REALLY Helps.)
Author’s Note: This is Part One of a Four Part Series. Look for the next piece in this series coming in the next several days. Peace! B.R-T.
About the Author: Brett Redmayne-Titley has spent the last twelve years travelling to and documenting the "Sorrows of Empire." He has authored over 200 articles all of which have been published and often republished and translated by news agencies worldwide. An archive of his published work can be found at watchingromeburn.uk. He can be contacted for interviews or comments at live-on-scene ((@)) gmx.com.
The author’s new book, “THERE!” is just out. 18 chapters of the best in old-style on-scene reporting from hot-spots around the world. Please support my work by purchasing a copy from Amazon Books. All donations are greatly appreciated.
Stand-up! It…Is…Time!